|
Post by northernfarmer on Jul 4, 2023 21:50:07 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Bigtalk on Jul 24, 2023 3:23:54 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by northernfarmer on Jul 24, 2023 16:20:14 GMT -6
This is an enlightening article, pretty much explains why we see the garbage we do in the main stream media as they bury or try to discredit an expert who points out the truth and that would not be good for their lying ass climate change narrative.
|
|
|
Post by shmiffy on Jul 24, 2023 21:17:22 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by kenmb on Dec 9, 2023 19:00:20 GMT -6
Throw this in here. So the Super El Nino is looking to be as bad of a prediction as what they did by totally missing the strongest LA Nina since observing and documenting the ENSO cysles. But that is expected when the "experts" are not really that, but rather paid to promote the one outcome. Having said that however, it is interesting to note they seem to be forecasting something that is likely correct for a change. The oceans are not actually warming, nor are the oceans "storing heat way deep down to come up at some unknown time in the future" like the expert conclusions were being provided when the earth stopped warming.
So NOAA is forecasting a return to LA Nina. That is likely not going to be good for prairie farming as it tends to be colder and drier.
|
|
|
Post by Bigtalk on Dec 10, 2023 2:45:33 GMT -6
Our experts predicted a strong El Nino for the current season with no rain until at least January. They're now scratching their heads and making excuses because we had a wet November which looks like continuing in a normal weather pattern. Lesson being, you cannot pigeonhole weather or climate. There's way too many variables involved.
|
|
|
Post by cptusa on Dec 10, 2023 6:32:50 GMT -6
I think we got your no rain forecast. I've never seen it this dry.
|
|
|
Post by northernfarmer on Dec 29, 2023 19:32:09 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by northernfarmer on Jan 5, 2024 7:07:18 GMT -6
|
|
|
Post by Bigtalk on Jan 18, 2024 17:59:58 GMT -6
Yup! Electric vehicles are the answer.
|
|
|
Post by runninredhard on Jan 29, 2024 13:24:34 GMT -6
I think this is a "real climate change article". Although, it doesn't seem scary like all the rest! It seems like a "normal" report of factual journalism. Like equilibrium perhaps! www.nasa.gov/technology/carbon-dioxide-fertilization-greening-earth-study-finds/Now contrast that with this posted on January 13, 2024, notice to airmen and no-fly zone declared!
Guess what happens 10 days later - CLIMATE CHANGE and a rogue wave! There wasn't even a seismic event in the media to coincide!
Lets just lap it all up!!!!
|
|
|
Post by kenmb on Feb 4, 2024 19:05:30 GMT -6
Kind of what I suspected, no dinosaurs needed, nor millions of years to make oil. Interesting that the article says algae or bacteria is used. Heard it said recently that bacteria is constantly creating oil that we are pumping and this article basically confirms that. www.extremetech.com/extreme/169083-from-aeons-to-hours-new-process-can-pressure-cook-algae-into-crude-oilI wonder what the pressure is about 5000ft down in the earth. It is well understood pressure in the oceans is very high so suppose under dirt it may reach high pressure, same with plate movement creates high pressure. And since we know the ground gets warmer as we go deeper then it should be safe to accept that the heat requirement is there. So all we need to begin believing that oil is being made right now in the earth is existence of bacteria. And this story says they have the bacteria also.
|
|
|
Post by Bigtalk on Feb 7, 2024 21:59:29 GMT -6
Here's some interesting statistics you'll NEVER hear from mischievous climate change propagandists, like the U.N., CNN, the BBC, the Guardian, the New York Times, or the ABC. In Italy, in 1345, it rained non-stop for six months, turning much of the country into a stagnant swamp and making planting all but impossible. The economy collapsed, banks went bust and thousands died in the ensuing famines. The Great Mississippi Flood of 1927 was the most destructive flood in United States history. The water extended across 27,000 square miles and at one point the river was approximately 80 miles wide near Vicksburg, MS. The flooding was a result of persistent heavy rainfall across the Central U.S. starting in August 1926 and continuing through the spring of 1927. Historical accounts and scientific analysis indicate that South-Eastern Australia experienced 27 drought years between 1788 and 1860, and at least 10 major droughts between 1860 and 2000. The Federation Drought from 1895 to 1903 was the worst in Australia’s history, if measured by the enormous stock losses it caused. Here's a list of the deadliest floods in history: Note how they have NOTHING to do with anthropogenic climate change. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_deadliest_floodsTake home message: Weather extremes have ALWAYS occurred and they ALWAYS will. The notion that Humans have the power to change climate is preposterous!
|
|
|
Post by kenmb on Feb 9, 2024 9:25:21 GMT -6
I suppose that is why news and governments rank natural events like floods and storms by dollars of damage vs area covered. The $$ of damage keeps going up each year therefore floods for example are more destructive each year. And also that little detail being left out - people keep building more stuff on flood plains.
I suppose if we stopped electing incompetent people to government we would change all that. Good luck.
|
|
|
Post by rod on Feb 9, 2024 15:35:02 GMT -6
I was doing some "quality research" on ytube the other day & there was this headline - yes, another banner ad from the green washing climate f...kwits - blaming cows for the woes of this world !!! Then, for some obscure reason, rice (production) was compared to cows! I still can't work out the association between these two - apart from cows (apparently) fart all day & fart all night - causing a methane toxic cloud that will kill all in-sundry off in the world by smoko next Tuesday, & methane is produced from water on rice paddocks! Luckily, there's no methane produced in the squillions of swamps around the world !!!!
So I thought I'll do some quick maths about the food produced from rice - as meals per hectare. This is using Australian Riverina rice growers yields as they are the highest in the world bar none, & the lowest water usage per tonne of rice.
1 hectare of Riverina rice produces 11t/ha of "dry rice". Dry rice is 14% moisture - which is dried down from 18-22% delivered "paddy rice". @ 58% "whole grain" 11t/ha = 6,380kg/ha of milled rice. The stuff you see in packets. We're only talking about "whole grain" here not all the by-products from rice.
1 cup of UNCOOKED rice weighs 200grams. So that's 31,900 cups of UNCOOKED rice per hectare. One cup of UNCOOKED rice makes at least 2 cups of COOKED rice. One cup of COOKED rice is the staple for thousands of people around the world.
Let's presume people eat two cups of COOKED rice per day.
Therefore, 1 ha of Riverina rice feeds AT LEAST 31,900 people per day !!
|
|