|
Post by Oatking on Sept 17, 2020 9:27:48 GMT -6
I am not an expert but I was wondering if the was signal would work on my old John Deere ITC receivers . The reason I ask is because in the past I would get a notification if the sf1 signal is out and the greenstar would ask to change to waas signal. Its a shame to throw the old receivers old that work fine. How is the accuracy or can it be improved with waas.
|
|
|
Post by meskie on Sept 17, 2020 12:32:05 GMT -6
They work on waas but I’m not sure the jd steering works on waas or not.
|
|
|
Post by northernfarmer on Sept 17, 2020 13:15:46 GMT -6
That was the impression I was getting from the JD dealer, that the ITC unit will show a heading line on WASS but it won't connect to the auto steer to be functional so could only use it as a visual. So unfortunately I have an ITC sitting here that will soon be mostly worthless come the end of the year or when ever the switch is due to be flipped.
|
|
|
Post by Beerwiser on Sept 17, 2020 14:30:43 GMT -6
No experience with the jd stuff, but WAAS is not good enough for autosteer.
|
|
|
Post by torriem on Sept 17, 2020 17:28:25 GMT -6
It all depends on what you're doing. For many things like tilling, waas is good enough. I've had waas on my combines and swather for a while and that's plenty good enough. I think even broad acre seeding would be fine with waas.
I spent some time analysing the can bus messages from the itc and it's actually not too difficult to intercept the messages and change one byte to pretend it's sf1 and Auto steer is happy to steer with waas. I don't have my notes with me at this moment but can comment more on this later.
|
|
|
Post by torriem on Sept 17, 2020 19:21:18 GMT -6
Okay so the receiver sends out a signal quality message with a 65535 as a PGN, with data byte 0 being 0x53. This message contains the signal quality and type information.
I don't currently recall what the destination id is on these messages; they might actually just be broadcasts.
To steer, the autosteer looks at bytes 3 and 4 of this message. Byte 3 contains the signal type and the quality. The high nibble (4 bits) is the correction type, low nibble is the signal quality level. When only using WAAS, byte 3 is usually something like 0x36 which means WAAS with a quality of 6 (out of 10 I assume). When using SF1, and example byte 3 would look like 0x47, which means SF1 with a quality level of 7. Also byte 4 must always be 0x40 for autosteer to work. I think with WAAS, this byte goes to some other value. If you intercept the implement can bus traffic between the monitor and the GPS receiver using a microcontroller (has to be a faster than an arduino) with two can buses, one can just pass everything through in both directions, and then watch for this message and tweak those two bytes to pretend it's SF1. Then it will steer with WAAS.
Interestingly the actual GPS latitude and longitude information autosteer uses is contained in industry-standard PGNs that all GPS receivers produce, that ISOBUS requires. But of course since a Trimble or other receiver doesn't know about the proprietary PGNs, autosteer will of course not steer with those.
|
|
Mags
New Member
Posts: 40 Likes: 12
|
Post by Mags on Sept 17, 2020 22:15:38 GMT -6
No experience with the jd stuff, but WAAS is not good enough for autosteer. It’s not good enough for seeding between rows but adequate for everything else broad acre IMO. Been using it last 15 years or so and so have many others. Years ago i remember some days it would switch number of satellites it was using often and move around a fair bit if only receiving 5-6 signals. Last several years usually receiving 10-11 signals and way better than WASS accuracy claims. Happy with it and price is right.
|
|
|
Post by Beerwiser on Sept 17, 2020 22:28:57 GMT -6
Huh, I have only tried WAAS on the sprayer with no luck. Maybe because of the higher speed? Good to know that it is good enough for field work, I will have to look into it again for the tractor and AOG.
|
|
bap
Junior Member
Posts: 61 Likes: 28
|
Post by bap on Sept 17, 2020 22:40:49 GMT -6
I agree waas is plenty for broadacre...I still buy a rangepoint sub for spraying but the cost went up a big jump a year or two ago. I like torriems Idea of intercepting the traffic for those john deere thingys...
I would assume that you would have to write your own controller software and build a small board to splice in...not sure though but it sounds like it could keep some hardware useful for someone that wanted to play with it...
|
|
|
Post by Oatking on Sept 18, 2020 6:06:01 GMT -6
Torriems , after harvest can you help us guys by walking thru the basics on how the intercepting signals work and get the itc working . For broad acre autosteer or swathing or straight combining soybeans was would work fine even if their is 6 inches of give or take. just set the overlap a little more. Would Ag Express Electronic be able to help programing the itc for better performance. They are great at repairing ag monitors. thanks for the ideas torriems.
|
|
|
Post by torriem on Sept 18, 2020 8:54:37 GMT -6
Spraying with WAAS is, well, barely okay. You'd have to overlap a bit more to make sure you don't have any skips. WAAS is good to about a foot pass to pass, depending on how long the pass is. Accuracy (coming back to the same spot on another day) is about 1 or 2 metres. In Canada, WAAS works better on north/south passes than east/west. This is because WAAS corrections are intended for the continental US, and the farther north you go away from the US border, the less accurate the corrections are.
I don't think Ag Express could wring any more accuracy out of an itc receiver. Also theoretically the itc receiver will not even be able to use WAAS after 2024. The GPS satellites themselves are changing frequencies (WAAS corrections are carried over the GPS satellites on the same frequencies as GPS), and the ITC cannot receive on the newer bands. The US Gov't keeps pushing the frequency change back as their own departments are not ready for the change yet. The original changeover was scheduled to be complete by Jan 1, 2021, which is why John Deere decided to end their SF1 signals for the ITC on that date. However with the date pushed back, and likely pushed back further, there's no reason John Deere couldn't delay their SF1 change also, giving ITC receivers a bit more life.
We can talk about this more for sure. If you know anyone that likes to dabble in arduino microcontrollers, this is very similar to that. A bit of C programming experience is useful too.
|
|
|
Post by Albertabuck on Sept 18, 2020 9:21:01 GMT -6
Torriem...am I correct that basically any of the older WAAS receivers will be rendered useless when this frequency change takes place? LIke hand held units and older GPS units like my Outback STS?
|
|
|
Post by torriem on Sept 18, 2020 12:06:56 GMT -6
I know the frequencies are changing in general, including WAAS. A lot of GPS hardware was capable of the new frequencies from the beginning as they were in the works for long time. I suspect the STS will continue working just fine, or else you'd have heard about it from Outback by now, since the original deadline was Jan 1, 2021. And I haven't heard anything to indicate any other brands are going to stop working.
I could be way off base about my understanding of WAAS and the upcoming frequency changes.
|
|
|
Post by SWMan on Sept 18, 2020 21:01:04 GMT -6
Well Trimble WAAS may as well stop working, terrible this fall. They call it SBAS I believe in the monitor and I actually combined with it last fall and it was great, this year not so much.
I use Raven WAAS in the Rofgator and it usually is bang on, even day to day.
|
|
|
Post by meskie on Sept 18, 2020 21:16:42 GMT -6
The raven waas in our sprayer is pretty good but gets off a bit if your trying to follow the same tracks. Trimble is terrible in our seeding tractor.
|
|